Quoting Andrew G. Morgan (morgan@xxxxxxxxxx): > Serge, > > I'm not sure I'm too happy with hard coding the 64-bitness of > capability sets. It may well be a very long time before we increase > their size, but couldn't you prepare for that with some reference to > the prevailing magic numbers for the current ABI representation? Hmm, ok. I figured since the c/r code was in capability.h it would be obvious that going past 64-bit would mean a new checkpoint image format. I can see where that's silly... I'll put in a commented BUILD_BUG_ON like Alexey suggests - does that suffice? > Also, the use of 'error' as both a variable and a goto destination > looks a little confusing. Ok will change. Did you see any problems with the way I authorize a task's resetting of capabilities at sys_restart()? thanks, -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
