On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 01:54:27 +0400 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > And BTW, there is something unnatural when executable path is attached > to mm_struct(!) not task_struct, mm_struct is the central object for a heavyweight process. All threads within that process share the same executable path (don't they?) so attaching the executable path to the mm seems OK to me. What I always find a bit weird is that an MM container is used as the central point for a number of sched obects. But it's logical, given that the never-before-stated definition of a heavyweight process is "thing which share a VM". _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
