Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7][v2] Define clone_with_pids syscall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Serge E. Hallyn [serge@xxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
| 
| If a container at pidns level 2, with 1 more pidns underneath it,
| is checkpointed, then the checkpoint image should only reflect
| the base and child pidns.  The two ancestor pidns levels should
| not be there.

Agree. I meant to say that we would need to specify more than 2
pids when checkpoint/restarting apps with deeply nested namespaces
if any :-)

Specifying bottom-up may solve the problem I guess.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux