On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:01:10AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Alexey Dobriyan (adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx):
> > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:33:54PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > +struct ckpt_hdr_cred {
> > > + struct ckpt_hdr h;
> > > + __u32 version; /* especially since capability sets might grow */
> >
> > Oh, no. Image version should be incremented.
>
> Why? The format hasn't changed since my last set I don't think...
>
> Oh, I added the padding. Thanks. I have to bump it again for the
> next set (hopefully out today or tomorrow) as it adds securebits.
> (And hopefully a first stab at LSM, though it's not looking
> likely)
Well, formally format has changed.
But the statement is that image version alone is enough so
per-object image versions aren't necessary.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
