On Fri, 22 May 2009 16:35:14 +0800 Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > On Fri, 22 May 2009 11:00:12 +0800 > > Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Now we have 'stat' file in both memory and cpuacct subsystems. If we > >> mount these 2 subsystems with option 'noprefix', the creation of 'stat' > >> file for cpuacct will fail, but without any notificatin to the user. > >> > >> With this patch, we fail the mount/remount in this case. > >> > > > > Hm, shouldn't we allow "noprefix" to be effective only agaisnt cpuset ? > > I think it's just for backward-compatibility of cpuset. > > (I don't like the option at all.) > > > > Yes, this mount option was introduced for cpuset. But it has been here for > a long time and people may use it when mounting other cgroup subsystems, > then is it OK to change to restrict its use within cpuset only? Asking libcgroup people may be appropriate...added CC. Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
