Hi all, I would like to bind given physical memory to specific task group, however it does not take effect in my experiments. Are there something wrong in my experiments. My experiment is done under the kernel 2.6.29.3 and I constructed my task group by following commands: a) In shell #1, prepare a bash : # bash # echo $$ 2253 b) In shell #2, prepare the memory control via cgroupfs: # mount -t cgroup cgroup /mnt/mycgrp # cd /mn/mycgrp # mkdir mycontainer # echo 0 > mycontainer/cpuset.mems # echo 0-1 > mycontainer/cpuset.cpus # echo 2252 > mycontainer/tasks # cat mycontainer/memory.usage_in_bytes 2875392 # echo 3000000 > mycontainer/memory.max_usage_in_bytes # cat mycontainer/memory.max_usage_in_bytes 3002368 c) In Shell #1, run a memory consumer (in which, malloc() is called to allocate memory and not free until program is existed) to allocate 500M memory: # /tmp/memoy_consumer_program 500 In Shell #2, the used memory ascends from start point 2875392 when program begins (from number presented in memory.usage_in_bytes), but it return to start point when it touches the maximal boundary. On the other hand, I also run the top to watch the memory hold by memoy_consumer_program. In top, the memory (both virtual and rss memory ) is always growing without any limitation. Is this phenomenon the correct behaviors of memory cgroups? Best Regards, Anqin _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers