On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 17:56 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > So, we shall have to come up with something better, I think Dhaval was > implementing upper limit for cpu controller. May be PeterZ and Dhaval can > give us some pointers how did they manage to implement both proportional > and max bw control with the help of a single tree while maintaining the > notion of prio with-in cgroup. We don't do max bandwidth control in the SCHED_OTHER bits as I oppose to making it non work conserving. SCHED_FIFO/RR do constant bandwidth things and are always scheduled in favour of SCHED_OTHER. That is, we provide a minimum bandwidth for real-time tasks, but since having a maximum higher than the minimum is useless since one cannot rely on it (non deterministic) we put max = min. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
