On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:07:17PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Heh, because there is no such thing as a 'container'. Oh, yes, there is. Set of tasks shares set of uts_ns, ipc_ns, mnt_ns, pid_ns and net_ns. No other task shares this set. Pid_ns set has tree hierarchy. All user_ns which come from credentials of set of tasks aren't shared with other tasks. Such set of tasks logically forms a container. > There is a set of tasks in the same freezer control group, and it's > possible that there is a task not in that cgroup which is in the same > utsname as the rest of the tasks in that freezer cgroup. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
