On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:53:59 +0200 Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Got a question for you. Does memory controller already have the per cgroup > > dirty pages limit? If no, has this been discussed in the past? if yes, > > what was the conclsion? > IMHO, dirty page handling and I/O throttling is a different problem. - A task (or cgroup) which makes the page dirty and - A task (or cgroup) to which a page is accounted Is different from each other, in general. I have a plan to add dirty_ratio to memcg, but it's for avoiding massive stavation in memory reclaim, not for I/O control. If you want to implement I/O throttle in MM layer, plz don't depend on memcg. The perpose is different. Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
