Re: [PATCH] c/r: Take uts_sem during checkpoint (v2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Dan Smith (danms@xxxxxxxxxx):
> SH> So it would be robust to future code changes if you
> 
> SH> #define MAX_UTS_LEN (__NEW_UTS_LEN+1)
> 
> SH> in utsname.h, so that anyone expanding the size of hostname
> SH> doesn't need to look for this usage.
> 
> Yeah, I think that came up in a prior round of comments on the UTS
> stuff, but got dropped when we started depending on strlen() of the
> names instead.  I suppose I should actually do it now... :)

Ok, please keep my Ack on the result.

thanks,
-serge
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux