Quoting Elwin Stelzer Eliazer (stelzere@xxxxxxxxx): > Hi, > > I am trying to use network namespace for virtualizing some socket > applications i already have. > These applications interact with Apache through 'lo' 127.0.0.1:nnn sockets > now. > When i virtualize, i do not want to run Apache inside the container, and has > to be outside. > I can not use any non-127.x.x.x IP address for this purpose, or have any > separate "host-only" kind of internal network. > I would appreciate if someone can let me know the options i have to > accomplish this, with network namespace, and 2.6.29 or 2.6.30. So to be clear, what you want is to have an application in a separate network namespace from apache, but talking over a shared loopback? Can you use a veth tunnel pair? You don't have to tie them to a bridge so the socket app won't be on the public net. -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers