On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 13:03 -0700, Mike Waychison wrote: > Polluting the dmesg buffer with messages from common failures (consider > a multi-user cluster where checkpoints may or may not succeed) isn't > very useful. Yeah, I've already gotten an earful from Serge and Dan S. about this. :) Serge suggested that, perhaps, the audit framework could be used. We might also use an ftrace buffer if we want to keep a whole ton of messages around, too. dmesg is definitely not workable long-term at all. -- Dave _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
