Re: [PATCH] [RFC] c/r: Add UTS support (v2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



SH> Someone might complain about the per-task namespace data not
SH> showing up in the per-task data, but I think the way you have it
SH> simplifies things enough to justify it.

Yeah, mktree would get pretty ugly without doing it ahead of time, I
think.

SH> Do add a note to Documentation/checkpoint/internals.txt (and maybe
SH> use __NEW_UTS_LEN+1 instead of 65), but other than that it looks
SH> good to me.

I was replicating exactly what is in the struct definitions of
linux/utsname.h, but okay :)

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: danms@xxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux