Hi Vivek, It would be very appreciated if the patches can be based on 2.6.28. Thanks a lot. Anqin On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Vivek, > > Could you tell me to which kernel I can apply your patches? > # latest mm? > I would like to test your controller. > > Thank you, > Takuya Yoshikawa > > > Vivek Goyal wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Here is another posting for IO controller patches. Last time I had posted >> RFC patches for an IO controller which did bio control per cgroup. >> >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/6/227 >> >> One of the takeaway from the discussion in this thread was that let us >> implement a common layer which contains the proportional weight scheduling >> code which can be shared by all the IO schedulers. >> >> Implementing IO controller will not cover the devices which don't use >> IO schedulers but it should cover the common case. >> >> There were more discussions regarding 2 level vs 1 level IO control at >> following link. >> >> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2009-January/015402.html >> >> So in the mean time we took the discussion off the list and spent time on >> making the 1 level control apporoach work where majority of the proportional >> weight control is shared by the four schedulers instead of each one having >> to replicate the code. We make use of BFQ code for fair queuing as posted >> by Paolo and Fabio here. >> >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/11/148 >> >> Details about design and howto have been put in documentation patch. >> >> I have done very basic testing of running 2 or 3 "dd" threads in different >> cgroups. Wanted to get the patchset out for feedback/review before we dive >> into more bug fixing, benchmarking, optimizations etc. >> >> Your feedback/comments are welcome. >> >> Patch series contains 10 patches. It should be compilable and bootable after >> every patch. Intial 2 patches implement flat fair queuing (no cgroup >> support) and make cfq to use that. Later patches introduce hierarchical >> fair queuing support in elevator layer and modify other IO schdulers to use >> that. >> >> Thanks >> Vivek >> _______________________________________________ >> Containers mailing list >> Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers >> > > _______________________________________________ > Containers mailing list > Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers > _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
