Quoting Dave Hansen (dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 17:04 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Sukadev Bhattiprolu (sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > > > > > > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:17:07 -0800 > > > Subject: [PATCH] Deny external checkpoint unless task is frozen > > > > > > Remove a 'FIXME' and ensure that the tasks we are checkpointing are > > > frozen unless its a self-checkpoint. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Agreed. I personally would like to just get rid of support > > for t==current, but don't expect to get anywhere with that > > argument :) > > Along the lines of what Ingo has been asking for, do we need to expose > this logic in some way? Do we need a /proc/$$/checkpointable file which > says, "I'm not checkpointable because I'm not frozen"? I really like that. > Or, is this just a core part of the API: you have to freeze before > checkpointing? As such, we'll never move to a place where we're not > frozen when checkpointing, so we might as well not even track or expose > it. the only way that would make sense is if sys_checkpoint went ahead and frozen them all, right? -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers