Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86_86 support of checkpoint/restart (Re: Checkpoint / Restart)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 10:02 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Signal handling and ptrace single stepping are two places I would
> imagine we have to enter the kernel and preserve those registers.  Is
> that why you were suggesting overloading signal delivery?

There is also, of course, good old interrupt handling.  Even if the
process is running and not making any system calls is timeslice has to
expire sometime. 

-- Dave

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux