On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 11:44:00PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:41:53PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > > > So, we have some more options now: /cgroups, /containers, > > > /dev/cpuset, /dev/cpuctl, /opt/cgroup, /opt/cpuset. > > > > Putting new mount points in / is not really acceptable, so that rules > > out the first two. /opt is just totally wrong, since that is intended > > for add on software packages. /dev/ feels a little odd, since it is > > not really device nodes > > I agree with all that Thadeu Lima says here. I would add that cgroups > are nothing to do with device nodes, so definitely don't belong in > ‘/dev/’ either. The message you quoted is from Daniel Berrange, not me. Could you also tell your rationale for not agreeing with /? Regards, Cascardo. > Since they're a filesystem mapping “for browsing and manipulation > from user space” of a kernel facility, I think ‘/sys/cgroups/’ is > appropriate. > > -- > \ “It's my belief we developed language because of our deep inner | > `\ need to complain.” —Jane Wagner, via Lily Tomlin | > _o__) | > Ben Finney
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
