Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > Linux Documentation is not consistent and have some funny options. In > Documentation/cgroups/*, we have: > So, we have some more options now: /cgroups, /containers, /dev/cpuset, > /dev/cpuctl, /opt/cgroup, /opt/cpuset. > > I am copying the container and the kernel guys. Perhaps, we can find an > agreement (if we want to find one at all) and change all that > Documentation to get consistent. I'd vote for "cgroups" or "containers", mounted at / or /sys/. /opt feels more like where software should live, and /dev should be for devices rather than capabilities/management. "cpuctl" and "cpuset" are subsets of the full capabilities of cgroups, so they're suboptimal as far as naming. Chris _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
