Hi Serge, Thank you for the comment. I have checked the patch works on the Oren's latest patchset(v13) also. And, ... I notice the email's subject was incorrect. Oops. As you know, "x86_64 support" is correct. Thanks, Masahiko. On 2009-01-28 at 15:59 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Masahiko Takahashi (m-takahashi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx): > > Hi, > > > > I'm now working on porting to x86_64 with help from Nauman Rafique. > > Here is the preliminary patch. If there is someone who is interested > > in x86_64 support, please join. > > Cool. Looks nice and minimal. Thanks for doing this. > > > This patch is to support x86_64 on Oren's checkpoint/restart patchset > > (v12 on December 29th). His patchset is well implemented, so the x86_64 > > patch is only handling architecture specific registers. (Maybe I'm > > missing something important...) > > > > I've tested this patch with his test suite (self.c and rstr.c) but I'm > > not confident especially in handling segment registers (%fs/%gs). > > > > This patch doesn't support external checkpointing, nor 32bit binary > > Heh, and I just realized that my s390 port doesn't do self-checkpoint, > I'd only been doing external. Oops. > > > checkpoint/restart on 64bit Linux. > > > > I would appreciate any comments and feedback. > > -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers