On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 09:10:53PM +0530, Balbir Singh (balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > Having some special application which will monitor /dev/mem_notify and > > kill processes based on its own hueristics is a good idea, but when it > > fails to do its work (or does not exist) system has to have ability to > > make a progress and invoke a main oom-killer. > > The last part is what we've discussed in the mini-summit. There should > be OOM kill notification to user space and if that fails let the kernel > invoke the OOM killer. The exact interface for notification is not > interesting, one could use netlink if that works well. Yes, that's exactly what I would like to see. Btw, netlink will not be a good idea, since it requires additional (and quite big) allocation. I believe just reading the char device (or maybe having a syscall) is enough, but its up to the implementation. -- Evgeniy Polyakov _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers