On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@xxxxxxx> wrote: > To use oom_adj effectively one should continuously monitor oom_score of all > the processes, which is a complex moving target and keep on adjusting the > oom_adj of many tasks which still cannot guarantee the order. This controller > is deterministic and hence easier to use. > Why not add an option to make oom_adj ensure strict ordering instead? -- Arve Hjønnevåg _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
