On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:45:02 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:20:45 -0800 > Matthew Helsley <matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think > - Paul's suggestion sounds attractive. But I can't see fundamental differences > from user's side between "implemented as subsys" and "implemetned as cgroup's > feature". I feel it's easier for user's cgroup library to handle subsys rather > than "we can mount it anywhere, multiple times!". > Flexiblity doesn't means it's easy to use. I should consider more.... mutiple mount point means that the process can belongs to multiple nickname groups. oh yes, seems worth to try. Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
