chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 09:50:29AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >> Guenter Roeck wrote: >> >>> As far as I recall, if you have sysfs active and use the sysfs patch to >>> let you configure both sysfs and network namespaces, you can only move >>> virtual interfaces into a network namespace. >>> >>> Guenter >>> >>> >> Ah ! yes, you are right :) >> >> The current upstream implementation allowing sysfs and netns to coexist >> together has one restriction, the physical network devices can not be >> moved if sysfs is enabled in the kernel. This is why Chris can not move >> the physical network device with this version of the kernel. >> This restriction will be set until the sysfs per namespace is fully >> supported. >> >> This restriction does not exist with with the previous kernel version >> with the sysfs per namespace patchset. >> >> -- Daniel >> >> > > Ah, great, thanks to all for your help on this. > Do you have any rough estimate when the support for sysfs per namespace will > The sysfs per namespace has been rejected because of some design problems related with the sysfs itself. Perhaps Eric can tell more about that... _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
