Re: [RFC][PATCH] IP address restricting cgroup subsystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Grzegorz Nosek wrote:> On śro, sty 07, 2009 at 04:36:35 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:>> Grzegorz Nosek wrote:>>>>> IP addresses are write-once (via /cgroup/.../ipaddr.ipv4 in dotted-quad>>>> Why they should be write-once ?>>> No real (technical) reason. Making it read-write would be fine with me.>>> I wanted to make the restriction a one-way road but I guess I can police>>> that in userspace (simply don't write anything to the file twice).>>>>> But seems the patch makes it impossible to re-allow a restricted task to>> be binded to INADDR_ANY.> > Yes, my goal is to disallow that but I don't insist to do that in the> kernel (I'm not currently planning to let untrusted root loose in a> container).> >> Firstly, is inheritance necessary ?> > It would be nice to have when the container's root is untrusted but> might want to subdivide the container's cgroup for other purposes.> Without inheritance, they would be able to circumvent the IP address> restriction. One could argue that a full untrusted-root container would> need a proper network namespace anyway (and giving CAP_SYS_ADMIN there> is probably a very bad idea), but still, I'd feel uneasy.> >> If yes, then how about:>>>> The root cgroup is read-only, so the tasks in it always bind to INADDR_ANY.>> For other cgroups, write is allowed only if it has no children and the>> parent is INADDR_ANY.> > Yes, I like that. Will update the patch. I assume that I must check> list_empty(&cgroup->children)?
Yes.
> Should I use cgroup_lock()/cgroup_unlock()
Yes.
> or other locking? I think it will be safe to do without locks but would> rather get some expert advice.> 
No. Without locks, it races with mkdir.
=============
//cgroup_lock();
if (list_empty(&cgrp->children) &&    parent->ipv4_addr == INADDR_ANY)					   <--- mkdir()	ipcgroup->ipv4_addr = new_addr;
//cgroup_unlock();
==============
In the above case, ipcgroup->ipv4_addr = new_addr,but child_cgroup->ipv4_addr == INADDR_ANY, which is not expected.
> Thanks a lot for your comments.> > Best regards,>  Grzegorz Nosek> _______________________________________________Containers mailing listContainers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers


[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux