On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 15:18 -0800, Matt Helsley wrote: > Yes, I was aware that the inode might be dirtied by another container. I > was thinking that, at least in the case of NFS, it makes sense to report > the node name of the container that did the original mount. Of course > this doesn't address the general RPC client case and, like patch 3, it > makes the superblock solution rather NFS-specific. That brings me to a > basic question: Are there any RPC clients in the kernel that do not > operate on behalf of NFS? Yes. There is, for instance, the portmapper/rpcbind client. The NFS and lockd servers also sometime needs to send RPC callbacks. Assuming that you can convert the RPC client into something NFS-specific is therefore not an option. Trond _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
