On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 15:58 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > So should we use patch 2/4, plus (as someone - was it you? - suggested) > using a DEFAULT instead of init_utsname()->nodename when > current->utsname() == NULL? No. I'm don't think that 2/4 is correct either. Basically, 2/4 is saying that the container that first mounts the filesystem 'owns' it. However at the same time we know that the lifetime of the filesystem is in no way bounded by the lifetime of the container, and that's what gets you into trouble with 'umount' in the first place. IMO, the current code is the most correct approach, in that it assumes that the filesystems are owned by the 'init' namespace. Trond _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
