Oleg Nesterov [oleg@xxxxxxxxxx] wrote: | On 12/24, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: | > | > Oleg Nesterov [oleg@xxxxxxxxxx] wrote: | > | And, SI_ASYNCIO only matters when we send the signal to the subnamespace, | > | and in that case we will probably mangle .si_pid. So why don't we warn | > | when .si_code == SI_USER? | > | > I was wondering if I should there too :-) But what do you think ? | | Well, if you ask me, I'd suggest to document the problems with | sigqueueinfo() and forget. Whatever we do, we can't be always | right. Ok. According to http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/rt_sigqueueinfo.2.html. rt_sigqueueinfo() is not directly published to users and users can't be passing in siginfo_t directly. So no man page update is needed either ? Sukadev _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
