Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/6][v3] Protect init from unwanted signals more

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/6][v3] Protect init from unwanted signals more
From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:31:02 -0800 (PST)
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bastian@xxxxxxxxxxxx, oleg@xxxxxxxxxx, ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx, containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xemul@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Sukadev Bhattiprolu's message of Saturday, 20 December 2008 16:53:19 -0800 <20081221005319.GB5025@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

References:
- [RFC][PATCH 0/6][v3] Container-init signal semantics
  - From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
- [RFC][PATCH 2/6][v3] Protect init from unwanted signals more
  - From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6][v3] Container-init signal semantics
Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6][v3] Remove 'handler' parameter to tracehook functions
Previous by thread: [RFC][PATCH 2/6][v3] Protect init from unwanted signals more
Next by thread: [RFC][PATCH 3/6][v3] Define/set SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE_FROM_NS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Cgroups] [Netdev] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux