Quoting Dave Hansen (dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 11:55 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: Thanks for taking look. ... > > -#if defined(CONFIG_SYSVIPC) && defined(CONFIG_IPC_NS) > > +#ifdef CONFIG_POSIX_MQUEUE > > +extern void mq_init_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns); > > +/* default values */ > > +#define DFLT_QUEUESMAX 256 /* max number of message queues */ > > +#define DFLT_MSGMAX 10 /* max number of messages in each queue */ > > +#define HARD_MSGMAX (131072/sizeof(void *)) > > +#define DFLT_MSGSIZEMAX 8192 /* max message size */ > > +#else > > +#define mq_init_ns(ns) > > +#endif > > Do all these empty suckers need do{}while(0)'s? Couldn't hurt for future-proofing. Will do, thanks. > > @@ -109,11 +98,25 @@ static inline struct mqueue_inode_info *MQUEUE_I(struct inode *inode) > > return container_of(inode, struct mqueue_inode_info, vfs_inode); > > } > > > > +void mq_init_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns) { > > + ns->mq_queues_count = 0; > > + ns->mq_queues_max = DFLT_QUEUESMAX; > > + ns->mq_msg_max = DFLT_MSGMAX; > > + ns->mq_msgsize_max = DFLT_MSGSIZEMAX; > > + ns->mq_mnt = mntget(init_ipc_ns.mq_mnt); > > +} > > Heh, I read that as a structure definition at first! Could you put that > bracket on a new line. That's actually taken care of in the followup patch - same with mq_exit_ns. Sorry about that. (Still I'd rather not bother with the patch flux to change it just in this patch, since whenever I do that I inevitably mess up something else) > This part of the patch is nice. The -'s are next to the +'s and it is > easy to audit. > > The rest of the patch looks good. Mostly simple substitutions, and it > is pretty obvious what is going on. Thanks. I'm hoping that Pavel and Eric will give their input and maybe we can put this thing to bed :) -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers