Dave Hansen [dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: | I could have sworn we had some function like | task_is_in_current_active_pid_ns(), but I looked and couldn't find it. It was in one of the many signals patchsets we tried but none of them got accepted. We do have a variant out for review, ns_of_pid() that could be used, this patch task_pid_vnr() should be fine. | Maybe we should add one instead of open-coding this everywhere. If there are lot of users, we should define the wrapper for 'task_pid_vnr() > 0' but there is no other user at present (kill_something_info() checks for > 1). _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
