Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> Right. I simply meant most of the >> if (likely(p->pid)) conditional except for the counts is pretty much a don't >> care. Keeping the idle tasks off of the process list and out of the counts >> is useful. >> >> For this particular case what problem did you see with calling attach_pid >> with PIDTYPE_PID on init_struct_pid? > > On boot up, the CPU 0 idle task is attached to init_struct_pid, and not > the others. If you do a "attach_pid" on the next idle task that is created, > it will become the attched process, bumping off CPU 0's idle task from the > init_struct_pid. It should form a linked list. For other pid types we don't have a problem. > When doing the code you suggested, I end up with only marking the last > idle task to be created. Odd. It is all a linked list through the task structures. I'm guessing the initialization isn't quite right. Weird. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
