On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 16:10:38 -0500 (EST)
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:36:57 -0500
> > Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > +static int g_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> > > +{
> > > + unsigned long *ptr = v;
> > > + char str[KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN];
> > > +
> > > + if (!ptr)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + kallsyms_lookup(*ptr, NULL, NULL, NULL, str);
> > > +
> > > + seq_printf(m, "%s\n", str);
> >
> > Can we use %pF here?
>
> If there's a way to not print the "+offset".
Could be added, I guess. I wonder if it would be
reused elsewhere.
> blk_unplug looks much nicer than blk_unplug+0x78/0x278
<mutters something about in-kernel pretty-printers>
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
