Re: [PATCHSET] fix CGROUP VS RCU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:49:13 +0800 Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> current some cgroup struct are protected by RCU.
>>>
>>> struct protected by RCU:
>>> 	struct css_set, struct cgroup_subsys_state, struct cgroup
>>>
>>> pointer protected by RCU:
>>> 	struct task_struct.cgroups, struct css_set.subsys[*],
>>> 	struct cgroup_subsys_state.cgroup
>>> the last two pointers are readonly pointer!
>>>
>>> these patches are fix these structs, and pointers. And a faker:
>>> struct cgroup_subsys.root
>>>
>>> Not cleanup all yet.
>>>
>> These patches aren't sequence numbered.  In what order should they be
>> applied?
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> No order number, they are dependent(except 2 patches which have order number).

                            dependent --> independent

> 
> Lai.
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux