Serge E. Hallyn [serue@xxxxxxxxxx] wrote: | Quoting Oleg Nesterov (oleg@xxxxxxxxxx): | > > | Perhaps we can start with something like the patch below. Not that I like | > > | it very much though. We should really place this code under | > > | CONFIG_I_DO_CARE_ABOUT_NAMESPACES ;) | > > | > > CONFIG_PID_NS ? | > | > Ah yes, we have it ;) | | Except I believe all distros at this point enable CONFIG_PID_NS, so | I'm not sure it's the right thing to use. But if they do enable CONFIG_PID_NS they would want the signals to behave correctly ? IIUC, the reason we want to the hide the code is that it is not clean i.e if its not experimental or error-prone, are there other reasons someone with CONFIG_PID_NS=y want to hide it ? _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
