Paul Menage wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Matt Helsley <matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void freezer_fork(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct task_struct *task)
>> +{
>> + struct freezer *freezer;
>> +
>> + task_lock(task);
>> + freezer = task_freezer(task);
>> + task_unlock(task);
>> +
>> + BUG_ON(freezer->state == STATE_FROZEN);
>> + spin_lock_irq(&freezer->lock);
>> + /* Locking avoids race with FREEZING -> RUNNING transitions. */
>> + if (freezer->state == STATE_FREEZING)
>> + freeze_task(task, true);
>> + spin_unlock_irq(&freezer->lock);
>> +}
>
> Sorry for such a delayed response to this patch, but I just noticed
> (in mainline now)
> the change to move the task_lock() to only encompass the
> task_freezer() call.
>
> That results in absolutely zero protection from the task_lock() - as
> soon as you drop it, then in theory the current task could move cgroup
> and the old freezer structure be freed.
>
> Having said that, I think that in this case any locking my be
> unnecessary since task isn't on the tasklist yet, so can't be selected
> to move cgroups. (Although this does make me wonder whether
> cpuset.c:move_member_tasks_to_cpuset() can fail silently if it races
> with a fork).
>
> On top of that, for a system that configures in the cgroup freezer
> system but doesn't ever use it, every task is in the same freezer
> cgroup (the root cgroup) and task_freezer(task)->lock becomes a global
> spinlock. I think this would certainly show up on some benchmarks
> although I don't know how bad it would be in a practical sense. But it
> might be worth considering making using of the cgroup bind() callback
> to track whether or not the freezer subsystem is in use, and
> short-circuiting this in freezer_fork() without any locking if you're
> not active.
>
I think another reasonable and easier way is to disable writing freezer.state
of top cgroup, so we can skip checks in freezer_fork() for tasks in top cgroup.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
