On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 14:28 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Now maybe eventually he's going to propose something more esotaric where > doing the mount() actually starts the checkpoint (that's where I figured > he'd be heading), but I think it would still be one action on the part > of userspace telling the kernel "do a checkpoint". > > (Or am I wrong on that, Dave?) I don't really care how it is initiated. If a checkpoint was initiated by sys_mount() with special mount options, I don't see a real distinction between that and sys_checkpoint(). Or, a special ioctl() on a special device file for that matter. How we initiate it isn't important to me. -- Dave _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers