Re: [BIG RFC] Filesystem-based checkpoint

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:56 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> If you like I can take a shot at whipping up the new mini-fs, though
>> I think you're having fun :)
> 
> There are a couple of concepts that just get easier once you start
> thinking of this as an entire fs too.  For instance, cr_ctx just becomes
> crfs_sb.  For things like dumping in parallel, we get locking and
> lifetime rules for free from the vfs.

Well, 'cr_ctx' is per-checkpoint, while crfs_sb will single for the
entire system. So you'll need to add something per checkpoint anyway.

What other concepts get easier ?

Oren.

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux