Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): > This is a misconception: my patches are not "internal checkpoint". My > patches are basically "external checkpoint" by design, which *also* > accommodates self-checkpointing (aka internal). The same holds for the > restart. The implementation is demonstrated with "self-checkpoint" to > avoid complicating things at this early stage of proof-of-concept. > > For multiple processes all that is needed is a container and a loop > on the checkpoint side, and a method to recreate processes on the > restart side. Andrew suggests to do it in kernel space, I still have > doubts. Yes I still prefer in-kernel. Can you elaborate on advantages of doing more work in userspace? > While I held out the multi-process part of the patch so far because I Yup, and i appreciate your restraint until now :) It made your patchset much easier to review. > was explicitly asked to do it, it seems like this would be a good time > to push it out and get feedback. Can you send that out as a patch(set) on top of your v7? I'd love to see (and test) it. thanks, -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
