On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 10:13 +0200, Cedric Le Goater wrote: > hmm, that's rather complex, because we have to take into account the > kernel stack, no ? This is what Andrey was trying to solve in his patchset > back in September : > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/3/96 > > the restart phase simulates a clone and switch_to to (not) restore the kernel > stack. right ? Do we ever have to worry about the kernel stack if we simply say that tasks have to be *in* userspace when we checkpoint them. If a task is in an uninterruptable wait state, I'm not sure it's safe to checkpoint it anyway. -- Dave _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers