Dave Hansen wrote: > On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 18:34 +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: >> This flag is weak... testing it gives absolutly no hint whether the >> checkpoint may succeed or not. As it is designed now, a user can only be >> aware that checkpoint is *forever* denied. I agree that it's only useful >> as a "flexible CR todo list". > > Cool, so everyone agrees the patch is useful! Yes, definitively. It is a good idea. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
