Paul Menage wrote: > Hi Andrea, > > The principle seems useful, but you seem to be duplicating a lot of > the existing res_counter code. Agree. > > Could you not either: > > - include these two extra fields in res_counter? > - include res_counter as the first field in a res_counter_ratelimit? The second solution would save some space if the "ratelimit" part is not used. Anyway, I'll try to rewrite it to reuse as much code as possible and post a new patchset. Thanks for looking into it. -Andrea _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
