Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >>>> So there are 2 cases: >>>> * full isolation : restriction on VPS >>>> * partial isolation : no restriction but *perhaps* problem when migrating >>>> >>>> Looks like we need an option per namespace to reduce the isolation for >>>> af_unix sockets :) >>>> - on (default): current behaviour => full isolation >>>> - off : partial isolation >>> You mean some sysctl, that enables/disables this check in unix_find_socket_byinode? >> Yes. > > OK. Den, please, do :) hmm, would that allow sibling namespaces to connect to each other ? If so, I'm not in favor of such a solution. I understand the need. we had a similar issue with the command line tool pgsl. Could we work something out with the capabilities ? or make an exception if your ->nsproxy->net_ns == init_net ? Thanks, C. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
