Re: [RFC v2][PATCH 4/9] Memory management - dump state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Oren Laadan <orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>  checkpoint/ckpt_x86.c   |   28 ++++
>>  checkpoint/rstr_x86.c   |    2 +
> 
> please move these into arch/x86/mm/checkpoint.c and 
> arch/x86/mm/restore.c. (also, please dont try to abbreviate too much in 
> filenames, makes it harder to follow changes later on, etc.)
> 
> Cool stuff btw! Any ETA on when more complex apps can be 
> checkpointed/restored? Also, shouldnt at least part of this effort be 
> joined with the live migration efforts of openvz? (or do you see 
> fundamental, unsolvable differences?)

My understanding is that this is a result of the joint discussion (with the
OpenVZ folks present) that happened during the containers min-summit prior to
OLS this year.

-- 
	Balbir
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux