On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 12:09 +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > E.g. consider we are saving a container image on ipv6 node and trying > to restore from it on the one without the ipv6. In that case we *may* > have some object of for example CKPT_IPV6_IFA type of CLPT_IPV6_SOCK_INFO > and fail the restoration process when finding such in an input file. But > what we should *not* do is to write any information about whether we had > the CONFIG_IPV6 turned on on the dumping side and check for this on the > restoring side. The only problem I can see with this is that you lose efficiency, especially when you have to build your checkpoint image with lots of things that are config-specific. The approach sounds like a good one in theory, but I'm a bit skeptical that we could stick to it in practice, in a mainline kernel where there are billions of config options. It is definitely something to strive for, though. Good point! -- Dave _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
