On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 11:25 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > pid_t pid = getpid(); > > int ret; > > > > ret = syscall(__NR_checkpoint, pid, STDOUT_FILENO, 0); > > Interface-wise, I would consider checkpointing yourself signficantly > different from checkpointing some other thread. If checkpointing > yourself is the common case, it probably makes sense to allow passing > of pid=0 for this. I don't think it is the common case. Probably now when we're screwing around with it, but not in the future. Do you think it is worth adding the pid=0 handling? -- Dave _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
