> There definitely needs to be a mount option (and possibly a config > option to forcibly enable the mount option). I personally have 5 or 6 > different custom scripts that depend on being able to unmount and > remount devpts without losing access to the TTYs therein. Eventually > I will need to port those over to use "mount --move", but it would be > bad to have a random kernel upgrade just break my imaging/cloning > system. An interesting point. What should the semantics be. If we unmount /dev/pts and people still have ptys open. -EBUSY? Except for lazy unmounts? Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
