On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:11:47 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:58:03 +0900 > Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:14:07 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:11:15 +0900 > > > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:52:26 +0900 > > > > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > mem+swap controller means a shrink to memory resource controller > > > > > (try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages()) should drop only file caches. > > > > > (Because kick-out-to-swap will never changes the usage.) > > > > > > > > > > right ? only global-lru can make a swap. > > > > > maybe I can add optimization to do this. Hmm. I should see how OOM works > > > > > under some situation. > > > > > > > I'm thinking mem+swap controller in a different way: an add-on to > > mem controller, just as current swap controller. > > I mean adding "memory.(mem+swap)_limit". > > > Hmm ? adding a control file other than > - memory.limit_in_bytes > ? > Yes. I just thought: - memory.rss_limit_in_bytes (same as current limit_in_bytes) - memory.total_limit_in_bytes (rss + swap) Thanks, Daisuke Nishimura. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
