Dave Hansen wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 18:58 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> In the worst case today we can restore a checkpoint by replaying all of >> the user space actions that took us to get there. That is a tedious >> and slow approach. > > Yes, tedious and slow, *and* minimally invasive in the kernel. Once we > have a tedious and slow process, we'll have some really good points when "Replaying all of the user space actions that took us to get there" - this task is not even always possible without deterministic log/replay mechanism :( Oren. > we try to push the next set of patches to make it less slow and tedious. > We'll be able to describe an _actual_ set of problems to our fellow > kernel hackers. > > So, the checkpoint-as-a-corefile idea sounds good to me, but it > definitely leaves a lot of questions about exactly how we'll need to do > the restore. > > -- Dave > _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
