sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx writes: > > Like Pavel said, we had couple of attempts to fix the larger problem of > signal semantics in containers but did not have a consensus on handling > blocked/unhandled signals to container-init. Oh. I thought we were pretty close then I or somebody ran out of steam. > It would still be good to fix this "kill -1" problem. > > Eric had a slightly optimized interface, 'pid_in_pid_ns()' in following > patchset. Maybe we could use that ? > > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2007-December/009174.html Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
