hi,
> Now the problem this patch tries to address...
>
> As you can see you'd need p_{bdi,cgroup,task} for it to work, and the
> obvious approximation p_bdi * p_cgroup * p_task will get even more
> coarse.
>
> You could possibly attempt to do p_{bdi,cgroup} * p_task since the bdi
> and cgroup set are pretty static, but still that would be painful.
i chose min(p_bdi * p_cgroup, p_bdi * p_task) because i couldn't imagine
a case where p_bdi * p_cgroup * p_task is better.
> So, could you please give some more justification for this work, I'm not
> seeing the value in complicating all this just yet.
a simple example for which my patch can make some sense is:
while :;do dd if=/dev/zero of=file conv=notrunc bs=4096 count=1;done
YAMAMOTO Takashi
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
